While Anand is a paid pumper, he must also maintain an impression of fairness from time to time, or he loses readership. These tests have large memory requirement, as they chew on large documents, etc. Interestingly, memory reads were substantially faster, despite using the same memory and chipset. I am by no means an Intel fanboy but I, like most consumers is more concerned about bang for the buck than absolute performance. So an Athlon 64 would run code tweaked to run best on its architecture, while a P4 running the same test would run different code optimized for that processor. PC Magazine [15] ran extensive battery life tests in its Core2 Duo system reviews, so be sure to check those out for actual battery life numbers. However, what matters to the market sales is not how Conroe would really perform, but how it would appear to perform.
| Uploader: | Doucage |
| Date Added: | 16 September 2010 |
| File Size: | 42.57 Mb |
| Operating Systems: | Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X |
| Downloads: | 31015 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
Sysmar kids at Hexus can't be trusted. The temperature was read by a program, set up by Intel representatives. So the single cycle SSE2 engine offers a huge benefit in software rendering. They did a chip which matches AMD platform.
I expect AMD 4x4 will make Intel look really silly. But anyone with a good understanding of CPUs know this is impossible. Come on, you can check the configurations on the Chinese site. I would normally use an English source due to people's prejudice, but Intel doesn't give the western people the liberty to run SysMark and Winstone on Conroe.
Whatever, I do hope AMD 65nm parts roll out sonner than later Can I buy a dual-core processor now and buy a quad-core later on for the second socket.
A Chinese site got ee of one of this Con E ee 1.
Now, some words from Intel representatives. SysMark is about doing a bunch of activities at the same time, mimicking real computer usage.
So an Athlon 64 would run code tweaked to run best on its architecture, while a P4 running the same test would run different code optimized for that processor. Also, bapoc applications may be running at the same time during a SysMark test.
Because of performance per watt.
Any Trademarks used on this site belong to their respective owners. If there is any issue with the content of this site, please email sharikou yahoo. Since I didn't have a camera, I couldn't really take a picture. I am glad that the Chinese have started running benchmarks. We tested idle power and full throttle when running two copies of Prime95 [14]. I should commend the Israelis too. PC Magazine [15] ran extensive battery life tests in its Core2 Duo system reviews, so be sure to check those balco for symsark battery life numbers.
I am not trying to establish any authority here. Need to see more back to back tests with games and file conversions etc.
Sysmark Benchmark
I agree with your views. Well, sysmafk truth is probably this. The content-creation part uses apps like Photoshop, 3ds Max, Dreamweaver, and more, while the office-productivity tests use typical office apps, such as PowerPoint, Word, and Excel.
Rather than test battery life—which will vary substantially from one system to the next—we removed the battery and connected the system directly to an Extech power analyzer. When a lot of amateurs and script kiddies cheered Intel's IDF guerilla benchmarketing, I smelled syzmark fishy from the very beginning.
That isn't going to happen anytime soon. I'd like to see some explanations of how the predictions that have bounced around here could have been so far off.
Journal of Pervasive 64 bit Computing: Conroe close to be really busted
Remeber that 'common joe' won't need this thing. If, as you say, "Intel had avoided using this benchmark in all the Intel controlled benchmark runs. Though humans have the tendency to follow authority, we are not going to exploit that weakness. They also refused to run benchmarks themselves. After all, a 65nm chip is about half the size and thus price of a 90nm one with the same number of transistors.
No comments:
Post a Comment